Last updated on 2024-09-16 10:50:56 CEST.
| Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 0.1.4 | 4.27 | 44.30 | 48.57 | ERROR | |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 0.1.4 | 3.76 | 32.46 | 36.22 | ERROR | |
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 0.1.4 | 78.39 | ERROR | |||
| r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 0.1.4 | 88.82 | ERROR | |||
| r-devel-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 6.00 | 65.00 | 71.00 | ERROR | |
| r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 7.37 | 45.24 | 52.61 | NOTE | |
| r-release-linux-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 4.98 | 45.14 | 50.12 | NOTE | |
| r-release-macos-arm64 | 0.1.4 | 31.00 | NOTE | |||
| r-release-macos-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 46.00 | NOTE | |||
| r-release-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 6.00 | 68.00 | 74.00 | NOTE | |
| r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 0.1.4 | 31.00 | NOTE | |||
| r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 49.00 | NOTE | |||
| r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 0.1.4 | 7.00 | 75.00 | 82.00 | NOTE |
Version: 0.1.4
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package
anchors:
generate_schedule.Rd: Period-class
Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the
package itself and the base packages.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Version: 0.1.4
Check: LazyData
Result: NOTE
'LazyData' is specified without a 'data' directory
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64, r-oldrel-macos-arm64, r-oldrel-macos-x86_64, r-oldrel-windows-x86_64
Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running ‘testthat.R’ [5s/7s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(fmdates)
>
> test_check("fmdates")
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ─────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ────────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364),
akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ───────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ───────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang
Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running ‘testthat.R’ [3s/4s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(fmdates)
>
> test_check("fmdates")
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ─────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ────────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364),
akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ───────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ───────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running ‘testthat.R’
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(fmdates)
>
> test_check("fmdates")
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ─────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ────────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364),
akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ───────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ───────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang
Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running ‘testthat.R’ [8s/13s]
Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(fmdates)
>
> test_check("fmdates")
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ─────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ────────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364),
akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ───────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ───────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc
Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
Running 'testthat.R' [5s]
Running the tests in 'tests/testthat.R' failed.
Complete output:
> library(testthat)
> library(fmdates)
>
> test_check("fmdates")
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Error ('test-calendars.R:28:3'): Sydney calendar is correct ─────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
syd_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:28:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:55:3'): Melbourne calendar is correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
mel_hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:55:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:84:3'): NYC calendar is correct ────────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:84:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:110:3'): London calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20120101) + days(0:365),
hol_2012))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:110:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:131:3'): TARGET calendar is correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:131:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:158:3'): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20140101) + days(0:364),
akl_hol_2014))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:158:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:187:3'): Toyko calendars are correct ───────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20130101) + days(0:364),
hol_2013))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:187:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:215:3'): Zurich calendars are correct ──────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:215:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:238:3'): Hong Kong calendars are correct ───────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:238:3
── Error ('test-calendars.R:257:3'): Oslo calendars are correct ────────────────
Error in ``+.Date`(as_date(origin), setdiff(ymd(20160101) + days(0:365),
h2016))`: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
Backtrace:
▆
1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) at test-calendars.R:257:3
[ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
Error: Test failures
Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64